|
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The single C note is an undeniable improvement introduced into FE (→GE,EE) – it refers to modifications in bars 69-70. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes |
|||||
|
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
b2 in CLI is almost certainly a mistake of the copyist who allegedly looked at the bar which is two bars behind this one and mistakenly wrote here the 3rd group of semiquavers from bar 69. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
|||||
|
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The version of CLI is the original one, drawn from [AI]. It is confirmed by the traces of deleting f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Main-line changes |
|||||
|
b. 71
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 71-78
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Four pairs of dynamic hairpins in FE (→GE) and EE3 (→EE4) are undoubtedly authentic. However, the reason they are missing in EE2 is not entirely clear, yet it seems plausible to assume that the engraver of EE worked in parts covering particular kinds of signs and, perhaps influenced by the lack of dynamic hairpins on the previous pages of the Etude, he omitted this stage also on this page. See also bars 69-70 and 76. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
2 in 
before g. The sign was already added in 
in