



b. 56
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The accent in FE, most probably a long one, was added in GE and EE as a short one. In the main text we give a long accent, as in analogous bar 8. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||
b. 59-66
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The fingering in bars 59, 61 and 65-66 taken from FE (→GE,EE) and adopted in the main text, is undoubtedly authentic. Fontana, following the previous indications by Chopin, completed it in EE in bar 60. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In this context lack of category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the long accent featured in FE (→GE1). The short accent remains in a few editions; it could be a result of a misunderstanding of this aspect of Chopin's notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
According to us, e2 in CLI is rather the original version of this place than a simple oversight of a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Main-line changes |