|
b. 51
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In FE (→GE1→GE1a→GE2,→EE2→EE3) there is no change of pedal at the transition between bars 51-52. The comparison with analogous bars 3-4 proves the engraver's error or maybe an error of Chopin himself. In the remaining editions or impressions the missing indications were added. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
|
b. 52-53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In FE (→GE) there is no fingering in this place. Adding the indications in EE, Fontana included both authentic fingering (given in analogous bars 4-5) and his alternative proposals. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 52-53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
Lack of lower octaves in CLI is almost certainly a result of the copyist's error – the octaves are there both in the previous and in the next bars. In FE (→EE) the octaves are written in an abbreviated form with the use of the 8 sign. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated octaves' notation , Errors of CLI |
||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 53
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The b3 note on the last semiquaver in CLI is probably the original version of this place. The same note in EE may be a result of the editorial edition. However, in both cases errors cannot be entirely excluded. Cf. bar 5. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Main-line changes , Errors of CLI |
