



b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
CLI most probably preserves the original version of these bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes |
||||||||
b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The sources differ when it comes to the notation of rests at the end of these bars. The natural notation of CLI, in which the part of the R.H. ends with a rest, however, was not repeated in FE (→EE2→EE3). As it is not certain whether omitting the rests was done on purpose by Chopin, in the main text we propose rests in brackets as a variant solution. After all, the difference has a rather ideological than practical character. In the remaining editions the rests are present, which is most probably a result of revisers' actions. In EE4 and GE3 both rests are in bar 45, which is most probably a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 47-50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The version of CLI is undoubtedly earlier and less developed. In FE (→EE), and partially also in GE1 and GE2 (→GE3), the octaves in the L.H. are written in an abbreviated form. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
||||||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |