b. 38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
G in GE is a mistake (it was corrected only in GE5) drawn from the review copy of FE, which is proved by the visible traces of the note's deletion in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The third of CLI, impossible from the pianistic point of view, is certainly a result of the copyist's distraction, who forgot to erase the erroneously written d1. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
|||||||||
b. 38-50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The fingering in bars 38-45 and 47-49, originating from FE (→GE,EE) and adopted to the main text, is certainly authentic. In EE Fontana added to it 29 digits in bars 42, 44, 46 and 50; the additions do not change the fingering stemming from Chopin's indications. At the beginning of bar 42 an arbitrary completion of the fingering's digits was performed also in GE4 (→GE5). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 38-50
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
In the main text in bars 38-46 and 49-50 we give the pedalling based on the undoubtedly authentic pedalling of FE (→GE,EE). At the same time we correct a few clear defects, particularly:
The omissions and inaccuracies in bars 40, 43-44 and 46 were already corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 38-40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 1, Etude in C major
..
The accents in bars 38 and 40 in FE (→GE1) have a form suggesting the use of long accents by Chopin. In EE2 (→EE3) the signs were omitted. In the remaining editions common short accents were given. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in EE |