



b. 46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The sources differ in the number of octaves written in an abbreviated form with the use of 8: three in CLI, the 2nd and 3rd in Ap, 3rd in FE. Both in GE and EE the use of abbreviations was totally rejected. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
|||||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI the rest was omitted, hence the bar has only 7 quavers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of CLI |
|||||||||
b. 47-48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The line written by Chopin in FEcor was probably supposed to designate category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we do not give category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 47-49
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The version of CLI seems to be the earliest shaping stage of the part of the L.H. in the ending of the Etude. However, it cannot be excluded that the notation is incomplete (lack of ties) or erroneous (one-voice notation of bar 47). After considering all possible mistakes and oversights, the version of CLI does not differ from the version of Ap. In any case, Chopin waived dividing the octave in bar 47 already in the base text for FE, which we consider as the final decision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes , Errors of CLI |