Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 45-46

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

No marks in CLI & FE (→GE,EE

Long accents in Ap

..

The dynamic markings visible in Ap at the end of these bars should be unequivocally interpreted as long accents, taking into account the context of the one-and-a-half-bar long crescendo.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 45

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

c1-e1 in CLI & Ap

c1 in FE (→GE,EE

..

The enote, featured next to c1 in the lower voice both in CLI and Ap, was deleted by Chopin in FEcor. The simultaneously added fingering – the 2nd finger on a1 – already considers this change and cannot be applied to the original version (most probably Chopin would use the 5th finger in that situation).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 45-46

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

..

In CLI the copyist wrote fas the lower note on the 2nd beat of bar 45, whereas in bar 46 – f2. In both places one can also see added notes: d1 in bar 45 and d2 in bar 46, which certainly proves a correction (in bar 46 even a delicate deletion of fis visible). 

category imprint: Corrections & alterations

b. 45-46

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

cresc. - - in Ap (interpretation)

cresc. - - in FEcor

cre - scen - do in FE (→GE,EE

..

The difference in the notation of the crescendo hint in FEcor and FE (→GE,EE) is puzzling. According to us, Chopin's entry in FEcor was not performed by the engraver (it was totally omitted or – more likely – only partially considered, without the dashes limiting its range), so in the next proofreading Chopin wrote the indication again, this time divided into syllables (cf. bar 42). The interpretation of the entry in Ap is also not entirely clear. We assume that it was about leading it until  in bar 47.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 45-46

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

..

In CLI there are no naturals returning a1 and d2 in bar 45 and a2 and d3 in bar 46. These patent errors were corrected by Chopin in FEcor. The accidentals – apart from the first one – were overlooked in EE2.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of CLI