mUltimate Chopin

Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 47

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

..

In CLI the 7th semiquaver is written as d3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Enharmonic corrections

b. 48

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

..

The dim. indication in Ap appears together with a change of articulation of the lower voice in the R.H. marked in this manuscript.
In GE a longer form of the abbreviation was used: dimin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 48

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

Semiquavers in FE (→GE,EE) 

Crotchets in Ap
..

In Ap three last two-note chords of the lower voice in the R.H. are crotchets. After the previous (from the beginning of bar 47) five semiquavers, it means an attenuation of articulation (in this context semiquavers imply staccato, whereas crotchets – tenuto or legato), which corresponds to the final diminuendo. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Chopin's hesitations , Accompaniment changes

b. 48

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

No slur in CLI & FE (→GE,EE) 

Slur in Ap
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 49

composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor

No fingering in CLI, Ap & EE

Fingering in FE (→GE)
..

The missing last fingering digit in EE is probably a result of the engraver's oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE