|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI and FEcor the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of CLI |
|||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bars 4 and 12, the rhythmic corrections written in FEcor confirm that the crotchets in CLI and Ap are the original version changed by Chopin in all three analogous places. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||
|
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
We add a staccato dot in keeping with marks written by Chopin into FEcor in the analogous bars 4 and 12. As Chopin added dots in neighbouring bars, his inadvertent omission of the mark rises no doubts here. The dot was added already in GE4 (→GE5). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In CLI there are no naturals returning a1 and d2. The accidentals were also originally absent in FEcor, in which Chopin added both these two naturals and a third one returning f2 on the last semiquaver in the lower voice. Eventually, both FE (→GE,EE) and Ap have the correct notation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of CLI |
|||
|
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
A cautionary natural before c1 in the L.H. was added in one of the last proofreadings of FE (→GE,EE). The manuscripts do not include an accidental in this place. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
returning d1 on the 4th beat of the bar was overlooked, which is a patent error.
