b. 41
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
Lack of the returning b2 on the penultimate semiquaver is most probably an inaccuracy of CLI's notation. Chopin may have written the accidental already in the handwritten base text for FE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |
||||||
b. 42-48
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The second in CLI and Ap is the original version, compatible with the general texture scheme of the Etude, in which the chromatic passages in the upper voice are accompanied with two-note chords. In the main text we give the version introduced in FEcor (→FE→GE,EE). Chopin had already introduced a similar change in analogous bar 15, both in Ap and in the base text for FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||
b. 42-43
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the version prepared for printing Chopin did not use the dynamic hairpins he wrote in Ap (also in the next bar). In one of the last proofreadings of FE (→GE,EE) he, however, added a verbal indication. In the main text we suggest to extend the marked range of the indication, as there is no doubt that crescendo leads to in bar 43. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 43-44
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations , Accompaniment changes |