b. 34
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The ascending motif is provided with slurs only in EF (in the parts of both hands). The ten. indication over the G-g crotchet is an addition to the slurring (cf. the note concerning bar 32). The slurs visible in PE in bars 32-33 suggest that lack of analogous slurring of the motif in bar 34 may have been unintentional from Chopin's point of view. Therefore, in the main text we propose a slur over the group of demisemiquavers, analogous to the slurs from the previous bars. We do not propose a separate slur for the L.H. due to the fact that the next slur in bars 34-35 is written only over the R.H. (although it undoubtedly applies to both parts led in octaves). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 35
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
JC has the erroneous A1 as the 4th quaver in the part of the L.H. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
|||||||||||
b. 35
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we include the indication legatissimo, which is featured only in PE, despite the fact that its meaning in this place is not entirely clear. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 35
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The authenticity of the dynamic indications of PE in this bar (, dim., and ) is revealed by the insertion of the dim. indication inside the hairpins, so characteristic of Chopin. The authenticity of the sign in EF, defining a contrary concept, seems to be highly dubious in this case. See also the note in bar 34. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 35
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
JC has a cautionary before A1 on the 6th quaver of the bar. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |