data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The ascending motif is provided with slurs only in EF (in the parts of both hands). The ten. indication over the G-g
crotchet is an addition to the slurring (cf. the note concerning bar 32). The slurs visible in PE in bars 32-33 suggest that lack of analogous slurring of the motif in bar 34 may have been unintentional from Chopin's point of view. Therefore, in the main text we propose a slur over the group of demisemiquavers, analogous to the slurs from the previous bars. We do not propose a separate slur for the L.H. due to the fact that the next slur in bars 34-35 is written only over the R.H. (although it undoubtedly applies to both parts led in octaves).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
notation: Slurs