b. 32
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the wedges present only in PE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Wedges |
||||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC there is no performance indication, which suggests that visible in EF is probably an addition by Fontana. For the main text we adopt the indication ben marcato from PE. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC and GEF, the chord in the R.H. at the beginning of the bar is a crotchet. Without any doubt, it is an error (omission of a quaver flag). In bar 32(r) – repetition of bar 32 in Da Capo written out in notes – the described error does not appear in GEF. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC , Errors in Fontana's editions |
||||||||||
b. 32-34
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
Five signs in those bars are present only in PE. We recreate them in the main text, yet we slightly change their position, as without any doubt, their range must remain in a legible relation to the ascending demisemiquaver motifs. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in PE |
||||||||||
b. 32-33
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
The demisemiquaver motifs are embraced by slurs both in EF and in PE (in JC there are no slurs). While in EF each slur embraces the entire motif (five notes), the slurs in PE are shorter and they embrace only demisemiquavers. For the main text we adopt the notation of PE, the base source. category imprint: Differences between sources |