Pedalling
b. 526
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The mark must be authentic, it is not certain however, if it was not Chopin's intention to move it 4 bars further. Therefore, we propose our variant solution, bracketing the mark. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , No pedal release mark |
||||||||||
b. 530-539
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The above variants show both sources versions of pedalling of the bars (all of them incomplete or unclear) and their possible interpretations and supplementation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||
b. 541
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
No mark in FE or mark in b. 539 must be an error as in b. 544 the mark appears and performing all bars 538-544 sustained is unthinkable. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||
b. 548-553
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Pedalling marks in EE - in bars 548 and 552 as well as in b. 553 - must be incomplete. It is possible that they were incorrect or unclear already in [A1], which may have triggered their complete omission in GC (→GE). The pedalling marks may have been omitted by the copyist as well (cf. annotation to bars 259-265) as in GC the whole line of bars 547-554 lacks them. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
||||||||||
b. 555
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE placement of must have resulted from inaccurate interpretation of the basis/manuscript. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |