|
b. 377-378
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Given the apparently inaccurate notation of sources we suggest a slur based on a corresponding phrasing in bars 117-118. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||
|
b. 379
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
|
b. 383-384
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
It is hard to consider a longer mark in GE as an accurate copy of the GC notation (in any case, in bars 41-42 the same notation was read more accurately), while a long accent present in EE may exemplify Chopin's intentions. In the main text we present a version based on two consistent sources, GC and FE that most probably originated from the two autographs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 383-384
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Only in EE there is a pedal up mark at the end of b. 384, this may have been an editorial revision. In FE there are no pedal markings in these bars, which may have been the engraver's omission as there is category imprint: Differences between sources issues: No pedal release mark |
||||||||
|
b. 388
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The staccato dots in GE must have been added by the editor, however, they may most certainly be performed (compare authentic staccato marks in corresponding bars 31, 113 and 129). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
in 
in a corresponding bar 
