b. 375
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
We believe that both the short accent in EE and hairoin in GE result from misunderstanding of the base text notation. In the main text we present a long accent based on GC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 375-376
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Lack of tie on g in FE must have been the engraver's omission. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 376-377
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The tie on g in EE must be an error - in corresponding bars 34-35 in EE there is no tie. And the tie in GE must be a revision. See annotation in 377. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 376-377
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Differences in placement of - between the beginning of b. 376 in FE and b. 377 in EE - are mostly accidental and have no impact on performance. Our proposal presented in the main text seems to be the best for practical reasons. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 377
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The short accent in EE, given the lack of a note to be accented, must an inaccuracy of notation as there is a long accent here in both GC and FE. Lack of accent in GE must be an element of revision based on an assumption that in GC the tie on g was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , GE revisions |