|
b. 360-364
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A poorer version of EE - without accents in bars 360, 362 and 364 - seems original. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 367
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
A tempo primo marking visible in GC was not put down by Chopin, however there is no doubt about its authenticity. In GE it was replaced with a conventional marking used in such situations and in the main text we adopt a similar solution. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 368
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Short accent in EE is most probably inaccurate notation - both GC and FE, however based on different manuscripts, show long accents here. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Long accents |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 370-372
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we present the GC undisputable notation. No accent in b. 372 is an obvious omission in EE, and long accents in GE result form not thorough enough analysis of the GC notation (the difference in accents lenghth in bars 360-368 and 370-374 was overlooked). Double accents in FE may have come form a reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , FE revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 371-387
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In bars 371 and 387 we add cautionary sharps before f category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
