b. 339
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
There is no bass clef at the end of the bar in EE, GC or FE. Given this consistency of sources we may cpnclude that this error was already present in the two autographs. Since the chords of RH in b. 340 are notated on two staves, lack of the clef does not pose any problems for the text interpetation (in EE and FE b. 340 is printed as the new line of the text with the right clef at the beginning, which minimises the consequences of this omission). The clef was supplemented in GE. We can find similar inaccuracy in b. 347. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
b. 341-342
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE na GC there is no augmenting a to a in b. 342, which is obvious inaccuracy given in the LH part. In GC there is no appropriate in b. 341. FE and GE are correct. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
b. 344
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE the crotchet in LH is f-f. The harmonic context of the adjacent bars (335 to 350) suggests erroneously low notation of the bottom note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 344-347
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
 
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Inaccuracies in GC , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
b. 345
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE, GC and FE there is no raising a2 to a2. The accidental was added in GE, which must have been done by the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |