Pedalling
|
b. 250
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Absence of the pedal mark in this bar in FE is definitely accidental – not only are such marks present in the other sources, but also FE itself has them in analogous bars 258 and 266. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 252-257
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The only difference between the pedalling of EE and FE is the presence or absence of the pedal change at the beginning of bar 253. We include both those options in our main text as variants. The pedalling of GC (→GE) may also be authentic (cf. pedal marks in EE in bars 259-265), but the copyist's error is just as plausible, as he may have written here the pedalling for the next line of text (from bars 259-265, in which GC has no pedal marks at all). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 258
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE, category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 259-265
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The absence of pedal marks in GC (→GE) is most probably the copyist's error (see also note to bar 266). The pedalling of EE is probably authentic (cf. a similar solution in bars 268-271, confirmed both by EE and by GC). In FE, the placement of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors of GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 266
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
GC (→GE) has no pedal marks in this bar. This is almost certainly the mistake of the copyist (see also notes to bars 260-265 and 265-266). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
is missing after 
in this bar. We give the asterisk mark, as it is present in all the other sources.
1 (cf. bar 267). In our main text we suggest two, most probably authentic, versions of pedalling (
