b. 278-279
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Both versions of the slurring may be authentic, and the version of FE is probably later. However, the fact that GE - the source that was, after all, based on GC - has a continuous slur shows how easy it was for the engraver of FE to misread the manuscript. Bearing that in mind, we take the slurs of EE and GC as our main text. The practical difference in performance is very slight anyway. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 278
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC, this bar is marked as the repetition of the previous one, which must reflect the notation of the autograph. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||
b. 279
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The mark, appearing only in FE, seems very much in place from the musical point of view. This is also the only version that is definitely authentic, as the absence of that mark in GC (→GE) may be accidental, and in EE it is almost certainly so (cf. bar 275). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 280-282
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
EE does not have the treble clef in this bar, which is an obvious error. The correct clef in placed in bar 283 that opens a new line of text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |