b. 291
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE, the octave at the beginning of the bar is notated in the abbreviated form with 8. This is probably an arbitrary change that was introduced due to lack of space. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 293
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC, the 3rd quaver of the L.H. sounds as b1. At the same time we can see in the manuscript that it was corrected from a1. Taking into consideration the regularity of figuration in all the analogous places, it is hard not to treat the version of GC (→GE) as anything more than an error. Cf. the note to bar 294. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC , Alterations in GC |
|||||
b. 294
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 296-306
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC (→GE) the slurs end in bars 298 and 306, respectively. For our main text we take the consistent slurring of EE and FE which we consider more grounded in the sources and more justified from the musical point of view. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||
b. 296
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
GC has the flat before the chord placed at the height of d1. We can come across similar inaccuracies in Chopin's own manuscripts as well. GE has the correct text that is evident from the context. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Accidental below/above the note , Inaccuracies in GC |