Verbal indications
b. 101-104
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In GE1 (→FE→EE), the dashes defining the extent of the crescendo were omitted, which is surely a mistake. They were added back in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
b. 104-105
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
in A is written after the accent, yet still in bar 104. A comparison with similar bars suggests Chopin's inaccurate notation probably caused by lack of free space for entering the fortissimo under the octave f2-f3. In GE1 (→FE→EE), was placed at the beginning of bar 105. In our opinion, Chopin's notation was correctly interpreted in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 105
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
The indication is placed under the 3rd crotchet of the L.H. in A (→GE1→FE→EE). In GE2 (→GE3) it was moved and placed between the staves. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 107
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
It is not certain whether in A the word più has an accent above 'u' or not, as the possible accent blurs with the slur. In GE the notation is correct (i.e. accented), but this was not repeated in FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 109-112
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In the main text, we give the dynamic indications of A and GE2 (→GE3). In GE1, dashes defining the scope of the cresc. were omitted. In FE (→EE), the entire indication is missing. category imprint: Differences between sources |