b. 60
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
A has no slur in the 2nd volta of bar 60. The slur added in GE1 – perhaps by Chopin himself – is not clear as far as its starting point is concerned. It may be interpreted either as a continuation or as a freshly started slur. It was read as the latter in FE (→EE), as well as GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In A (→GE1→FE >EE1→EE2) Chopin forgot to put in a raising g flat to g. The error was corrected in GE2 (→GE3) and EE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||||
b. 60-61
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
A (→GE→FE→EE) has two slurs in this bar. In all the analogous places further on in the text (seven in total) the slur running from the 1st note of the bar ends in the subsequent bar. Then, it may be the case that the slurring in bar 61 is an initial version left unchanged due to Chopin's oversight. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
In EE the indication con anima appears only in bar 61. This is certainly the result of planning out the musical text in such a way that bar 61 is the first bar on a new page. For the same reason, this solution may also be recommended for texts created in our system. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |