Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
An evident wedge in A was reproduced in GE (→FE) as a dot (in GE, wedges were not used even once throughout the Mazurkas Op. 24). In EE, the sign was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE , Wedges |
|||||||||
b. 92
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
All the sources have staccato marked here with a dot. As in A Chopin used wedges in all the three neighbouring similar phrases, we consider this single dot to be an inaccuracy of notation. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Wedges |
|||||||||
b. 93-95
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The interpretation of the marks present in bars 93 and 95 in A is not clear: the mark in bar 93 reaches as far as the last quaver of the bar, and the one in bar 95 is only slightly shorter. That notation was reproduced faithfully in GE (→FE→EE). However, a comparison with analogous bars 41 and 43 suggests that what Chopin had in mind here were long accents, and this is the interpretation we give in our main text. category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Long accents |
|||||||||
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The wedge that can be seen in A above the crotchet on the 2nd beat of the bar was omitted from GE1 (→FE→EE). The correction was made in GE2 (→GE3), i.e. a dot was added. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The evident staccato sign in A, which in our opinion should be read as a wedge, was omitted from GE1 (→FE→EE1→EE2). A dot was added in GE2 (→GE3) to rectify that error. EE3 has an accent added instead, probably by analogy to bars 15 and 19. We base our main text on A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |