Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 63
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The lack of a staccato dot for E flat must be considered Chopin's oversight in A (→GE1→FE), as all the remaining bass notes in the accompaniment of that type do have dots. The reason for such inaccurate notation could be corrections, the traces of which are visible in this place in A. The dot was added in EE and GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The omission of the accent from GE1 (→FE→EE) was probably accidental. The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The staccato dot is missing in GE1 (→FE), which is certainly an error. The dot was added again in EE and GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In A there are traces of changing performance markings in the L.H. part. Initially both crotchets had staccato dots, which Chopin later removed lengthening the slur and adding an accent. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 73-88
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
Each of the ten minims in that fragment has a long accent in A, and although the signs differ in length, reproducing them with the use of various markings ( category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
and 3 short accents in 
