|
b. 16-20
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In bars 16 and 20 in EE, the R.H. part was divided into two voices, just like the previous bars: category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 16-17
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The slur added in the L.H. in EE is probably the result of an editorial revision (cf. another note in this bar). Accidental repetition of the slur from bars 15-16 is also possible. In the main text we preserve the only authentic version, i.e. that of A (→GE→FE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
There are erasures visible over the R.H. part in A. One of the reasons behind that correction was to shorten the slur that commenced in the previous bar (a similar correction can be seen in bar 48). Chopin probably also removed the accent above the 3rd crotchet, perhaps in connection with placing it between the staves. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
|||||
|
b. 19-20
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies |
|||||
|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
In GE2 (→GE3), a staccato dot was added above the 2nd chord of the L.H. This is probably due to an erroneous interpretation of A, in which the hook at the end of the R.H. chord stem, resulting from hasty writing, could be interpreted as a dot above the L.H. chord. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
. However, that formally justified change necessitated the introduction of another change: as in that new graphic layout the accent on the 3rd crotchet placed under the stave seemed to refer only to e1, another accent was added above c2. We stick to the notation of 
