Rhythm
b. 61
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The missing tie to e2 is most probably due to a mistake by the engraver of FE – see the note above. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 85-89
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text we keep the notation of the last chord in bar 85 and 89 used in A, in which the B note belongs – at least according to the notation – to the parts of both hands. The simplified notation introduced by GE (→FE,EE,IE) corresponds to the actual performance, but it obliterates the sequence of the R.H. bottom voice, which Chopin apparently wanted to show precisely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 87
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
According to us, the short stem of the g minim does not reach the b minim, written above it, on purpose, as it is provided with a separate stem. This means that Chopin saw them as parts of two different voices. This subtlety was not reproduced in the editions. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 91
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In A the g note is a semibreve, which is a patent mistake, perhaps under the influence of the notation in the previous bar. The correct rhythmic value intended by Chopin (minim) was introduced already by GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A |
||||||
b. 92
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The d1 minim in FE and IE most probably resulted from the awkward GE notation, in which the noteheads of the minims and the semibreves are identical. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in IE |