|
b. 259
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the R.H. part in A and FE1 there is only one category imprint: issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 260-261
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 260-261
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The absence of slurs in FE (→EE1) probably means that Chopin added them to A after [FC] had been finished. In EE2 the slurs were added after GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 260
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Initially, the 1st L.H. quaver in A contained only the top note of the octave, F. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Bass register changes |
|||||||||
|
b. 261
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Noteworthy is the similarity, despite the inaccurate reproduction of the accent, of versions of A and FE – cf. the other three analogous places where these sources differ significantly (bars 94, 98 and 265). This may mean, among other things, that this place was accidentally omitted in Chopin’s additions or corrections to the markings in [FC] or the proofs of FE1. Taking account of this possibility, we propose – as an alternative or supplement to the main text, based on the version of A – a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
, to the 3rd quaver. The remaining two necessary accidentals were added in 
in 
, our alternative suggestion
, our complementing suggestion