Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 256-257

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

No signs in sources

Arpeggio signs suggested by the editors

..

As in analogous bars 172-173 and 176-177, in the main text we suggest adding arpeggio marks to the tenths on the basis of the arpeggios added by Chopin while proofreading FE1 in bars 85-86 and 89-90.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 257

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  to a1.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 257

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

 in A, literal reading

in FE (→EE)

in GE

..

As in bar 85 and 253, we consider the  hairpin in this bar to have been inaccurately written by Chopin in A (too long). In GE the mark was additionally prolonged by one note. In the main text we give a  in the FE version, compliant with the vast majority of analogous marks.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins

b. 258-259

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

cresc. - - - in A

cresc. - - in GE

No indication in FE (→EE1)

cresc. in EE2

..

As in bars 254-255, cresc. - - was most probably added to A after [FC] had been finished. As there, in GE it was reproduced inaccurately, particularly the dashes marking its range. EE repeated the indication – in a reduced form – after GE1.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 258

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

..

In EE (reminder?) was added to the e2 note in the last triplet.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions