



Slurs
b. 130-131
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
We consider the missing slurs over the descending octave motifs to be an inaccuracy – cf. the slurs concerning the previous two motifs. The omission of 2 other L.H. slurs in bars 129-131 justifies the introduction of respective additions directly into the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
b. 131
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
In the main text we add a slur after the one present in the sources in an analogous figure in the 2nd half of the bar. The L.H. slurs in bars 129-131 include a few similar inaccuracies. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 133
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
Taking into account the 4 subsequent slurs in this and the next bar, always encompassing entire motifs, we consider the source L.H. slur to be inaccurate (one can assume negligence by the engraver or by Chopin in [A]). Therefore, in the main text we suggest a slur reaching c2; we also add a respective R.H. slur. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 136
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
There is no doubt that the omission of the slur in FE (→EE) was accidental – cf. the adjacent bars, particularly the first appearance of this phrase (bars 117-120). The slur was added in GE, perhaps at Chopin's request. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 138-140
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
It seems unlikely that the absence of these two slurs in FE (→GE,EE) could indicate a change in the performance manner compared to the similar figures, hence in the main text we suggest adding them. The slur in bar 138 is modelled on an authentic slur in bar 120, while the slur in bar 140 on the slurs in the preceding bar, yet in this case we lead it to the end of the passage, as in bar 134. category imprint: Editorial revisions |