data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Main text
compare
It seems unlikely that the absence of these two slurs in FE (→GE,EE) could indicate a change in the performance manner compared to the similar figures, hence in the main text we suggest adding them. The slur in bar 138 is modelled on an authentic slur in bar 120, while the slur in bar 140 on the slurs in the preceding bar, yet in this case we lead it to the end of the passage, as in bar 134.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Editorial revisions
notation: Slurs