Issues : Errors of JC
|
b. 60
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||
|
b. 61-62
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
Out of the two versions coming from [A2], we give priority to CK due to its compliance with the unequivocally authentic version of A1. The sharp raising e1 to e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of JC , Inaccuracies in JC , Errors in CK |
||||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
In JC, the octave in the L.H. at the beginning of the bar is an erroneous crotchet. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
Lack of hold of the 2nd quaver of the bar in JC is most probably a result of the copyist's oversight of the ties. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC |
||||||||
|
b. 63
|
composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major
..
It is only in EF that the lower voice on the 4th quaver of the bar is written correctly. In JC it does not appear at all (there are no quavers nor slurs), which is certainly an error due to writing the upper voice with the stems facing upwards. We do not complete this notation, as it is impossible to determine what was exactly missed by the copyist. In PE, lack of the quaver flag next to the f1-b1 fourth is an obvious mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC , Errors in PE |
1 & e1 in 
