b. 1
|
composition: WN 55, Waltz in F minor
..
In the sources, one can encounter a few variants of the Waltz's beginning: category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: WN 55, Waltz in F minor
..
CC features a minim (without dot). In another commenced copy of the waltz, on the rear 2nd page of CC, there is also a minim. Therefore, the absence of dot in this source does not seem to result from an oversight of the copyist of CC, but from the fact of copying from a source in which the dot had been overlooked (another autograph or copy of autograph). The minim in the remaining sources is provided with a dot. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information |
||||||
b. 1-23
|
composition: WN 55, Waltz in F minor
..
The first page of FC, to bar 23, has not been preserved to the present day. In the abbreviated markings of sources from Fontana's version we adopt: category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Incomplete sources |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: WN 55, Waltz in F minor
..
In AG, Chopin did not write the time signature; the remaining sources feature a 3/4 marking. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 1
|
composition: WN 55, Waltz in F minor
..
In this place, CC includes a single bar line, without repeat signs. After the first volta, there is a double bar line, yet also without repeat signs. We consider it to be an inaccuracy of notation in this source, one of many. In another copy of the Waltz, commenced on the verso of CC, there is a double line, without repeat signs. A similar situation occurs in CX – there is a single bar line, without repeat signs. The remaining sources feature a double bar line with repeat signs in this place. In FEF and GEF the repetition is written out with notes. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information |