|
b. 655
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The versions of FE and EE1 must be erroneous (in addition, FE do not contain a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 656
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the R.H. part, there are no accidentals in the 2nd half of the bar in FE. The necessary sharps were added in GE and EE (in EE1, only before the 7th semiquaver). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 656
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The cautionary sharps before the 1st octave in the L.H. were removed in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 656-657
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 656
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the only authentic notation of the ornament, written in A. However, we accept the notation of GE2 (→GE3), since it almost certainly marks the same performance. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
1 & d
before the 3rd crotchet), since a simple scheme, on which this harmonic accompaniment is based, would be distorted, without a sonic explanation. 
