|
b. 697-707
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we include the pedalling added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE (→EE). The composer overlooked only b. 699, probably inadvertently, to which we dedicate a separate note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
|
b. 699
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Taking into account the authentic pedalling of b. 693-695, we assume that the missing pedal in b. 699 is a result of Chopin's inadvertence or haste in proofreading FE. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 699-702
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The continuous slur in GE2 is an arbitrary, baseless revision. The original slurring was restored in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 702
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
After alterations, the L.H. part in A was deleted and rewritten on the stave below. The original version: category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||||||
|
b. 703-704
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
It is not entirely clear in A whether the slur in b. 704, which opens a new line, is to be considered a continuation of the preceding one, as it was understood in FE (→EE), or the beginning of a new one, as it was most probably reproduced by Fontana – in FC the slur at the end of b. 703 does not suggest a continuation. Therefore, the continuous slur of GE1 (→GE2) must be considered an inaccuracy, corrected in GE3. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
.
