mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 533

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

GE2 (→GE3) added a cautionary  before e3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 533-534

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Slur in A (→FC→GE), EE & FED

No slur in FE
..

The L.H. slur overlooked in FE was added in EE. Chopin added it also in FED.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED

b. 534-539

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Indications in EE

smorz. - - - in GC (→GE)

No indications in FE

Our variant suggestion
..

Each of the source dynamic markings may be authentic, in each of them, however, there seem to be chance elements - omissions and other errors. Since we are not certain about Chopin's ultimate intention here, for the main text we propose our variant solution.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 534-538

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

In bar 534, FEH repeated, this time without mistake, the fingering of exposition (see bars 179-184). In an abbreviated form, the fingering was repeated also in bar 535 and 538.  

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 534

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH