



b. 529-530
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur, encompassing the entire motif ending bar 529, most probably concerned the original version of rhythm – three semiquavers. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that the fact of leaving it here was a result of inadvertence at the time of marking or implementing that proofreading. It is also likely that Chopin abandoned proofreading of that correctly printed slur only due to its minor influence on performance. In this situation, in the main text we suggest a modification of slurring, including the authentic slur, added along with the change of rhythm in analogous bar 174. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||
b. 529
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like in bar 528, the pedalling could have been added in the last proofreading of FE (→EE), which explains its absence in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||
b. 530-539
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The above variants show both sources versions of pedalling of the bars (all of them incomplete or unclear) and their possible interpretations and supplementation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||
b. 530-533
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The LH crotchets are marked with staccato dots only in GC, at the same time b. 531 was overlooked, which in this context must be seen as omission. In GE there is no mark in b. 530. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||
b. 530-531
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Earlier endings of slurs in FE (→GE,EE) are probably inaccurate – see the note to bars 175-176. Due to this reason, in the main text we lead them to the quavers that end the motifs. category imprint: Editorial revisions |