mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 427

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The 1st note in GE1 (→GE2) is an erroneous b​​​​​​​3 due to the misplaced octave sign.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 427

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

On the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar, there are no accidentals in the R.H. in FE; the  raising G to G​​​​​​​ in the L.H. is also missing. In GE1 (→GE2) and EE, a mark was added in the L.H., whereas in the R.H. sharps were added only in the 2nd group of semiquavers, which was most probably considered sufficient due to the notation of that group with the use of an octave sign, hence at the same pitch as the 3rd group. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions

b. 427

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In the main text, we add a cautionary  before d1, and omit an unfounded accidental before c3.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 427

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

GE1 (→GE2) overlooked a staccato dot to the L.H. A. The mark was added in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 428

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

Octave c-c1 in EE

c1 in GC (→GE) and FE
..

Octave in EE may be an authentic version.

category imprint: Differences between sources