



b. 348
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The f note added in the proofreading of FE (→EE) is a change that certainly comes from Chopin. He also introduced a similar complement in the Concerto's 3rd mvt, bars 63-64. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 348
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The indication Solo is present only in GE and EE; in both editions it was probably added by the revisers. The absence of the indication in FE suggests that in GE1 it was added in the last stage of proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
b. 348-349
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 348-349
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing ties of the b-d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 348
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of EE, which can be considered an interpretation – ignoring the musical sense – of the slur of A, written with panache, could have been repeated after FE, which, after all, was based on A. In the very FE the erroneous slur would have been corrected in the last phase of proofreading (although there are no visible traces of such a correction on the available photocopies of FE copies). In turn, the slur in GE1 – beginning from f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in FC |