b. 473-475
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We include two 'ones' written in FEH in bars 473 and 475, perhaps by Chopin, in the main text. The remaining digits in this section, added most probably by the pupil, are discussed in a separate note. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 473
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, the accent in this bar is clearly shorter than in adjacent bars (there is a similar situation in bar 477). However, taking into account the fact that the note provided with that accent is a delay in the form of an appoggiatura, we suggest a long accent in the main text, more frequent in this context. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 473-475
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The additional mark at the end of b. 473 was written by Fontana, hence it is a mistake. This is how it was considered already in GE. Omission of the correct mark (in b. 475) in FE (→EE) is also a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 474-475
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slurs in A is a typical oversight of Chopin, related to the transition into a new page. GE1 (→FE→EE) added only the bottom slur, which, taking into account the double slurs in the adjacent bars, seems to be a simplified correction (or revision). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 474-475
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A (→GE1→FE) there are no sharps next to the top notes of the octaves on the 2nd beat of each of these bars. The patent inaccuracy was rectified in EE and GE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |