|
b. 496
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur over the quavers that, in analogous place in the exposition, were encompassed with a slur along with the next bar in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
|
b. 496
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of EE1 must be erroneous. It was corrected in EE2 (→EE3) in accordance with the harmonic logic and the Stichvorlage (FE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 497-525
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In this part also - the last one of its kind in the passage of Scherzo - the beginning of slurs in GC raises doubts when it comes to intrerpreting Chopin's intentions. Already in GE, based on GC, the GC were never rewritten here in accordance with the noatation (while slurs for LH were added). In EE and FE the slurs always begin on quaver figurations (except for the obviously wrongly missing slur in EE in b. 521). In GC the endings of the discussed slurs are notated inaccurately: in bars 501, 509 and 517 the slurs end over the pause on the second beat of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||
|
b. 497
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC, the copyist omitted treble clef in this bar. This obvious mistake was corrected - penciled in - by the engraver or editor of GE. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 497
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC and FE1 there is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Errors of GC |
in 
lowering g
2 to g2. This obvious mistake was corrected in