|
b. 330-331
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The tie of the b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 330
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE is almost certainly erroneous (in that edition a number of Terzverschreibung mistakes was committed). The error was corrected in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||||
|
b. 330
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In GE3 two Terzverschreibung mistakes were committed in this bar – g1 instead of e1 on the 2nd semiquaver in the bar, and C instead of E on the 2nd L.H. quaver. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||||
|
b. 330
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
According to us, the version of the editions resulted from inattention of the engraver of GE1, who did not notice the change of dynamic indications at the end of the bar. The crescendo in A emphasises the dissonant chord, introducing E major as a new key, constituting the starting point for further modulation. The accent in AsI confirms that from the very beginning Chopin wanted to underline the chord on the 6th quaver in the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 330
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In all editions the dashes marking the range of dim. were led farther than the ones in A (by Chopin). In the case of FE (→EE) the difference is marginal, but in GE the range of diminuendo was extended to the end of the bar. In this context it is of no practical relevance, yet it reveals a certain tendency of the engraver of GE – cf. bars 306-310. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
-d
in 
in 
