b. 497
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no accidental before the upper note of the 2nd octave in the L.H. in FE. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Accidentals in different octaves |
|||||
b. 497
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing hairpin is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 497
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary before f2. In analogous b. 493 the accidental is present in A and all the remaining sources. Moreover, Chopin probably hesitated in that respect, since the crossing-out visible there probably concerns the before that note, which means that it must have been entered twice. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information issues: Chopin's hesitations , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Deletions in A |
|||||
b. 497-498
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slur of A (→FC,FE→EE) must be inaccurate, which is proven by:
There is a similar situation in b. 507-508. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Corrections in A , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 498-501
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
GE1 (→FE→Ee) overlooked the dashes marking the range of the dynamic change. Similarly in bars 507-509 (and in many other places). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |