b. 683-695
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In both manuscripts these bars are written in an abridged manner as repetition of b. 232-244. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||
b. 683-695
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the pedalling written by Chopin in FC (→GE) in b. 232-244, of which the discussed bars are a repetition. It is only b. 686-687 that we discuss separately, in which the composer probably overlooked a necessary pedal change. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||
b. 683-685
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the marks written by Chopin in FC (→GE1) in b. 232-234, of which the discussed bars are a repetition. Just like there, the sign was arbitrarily moved by GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||
b. 684
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of FE must be a result of an overlooked note by the engraver, who was less careful this time (analogous b. 233 was reproduced correctly in FE, on the basis of the same notation of A). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||
b. 686-687
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
These bars are an exact repetition of b. 235-236, and the Chopinesque pedalling written there in FC (→GE1) is most probably inaccurate. Therefore, in the main text we suggest the markings given by Chopin in analogous b. 103-104. Such a revision was introduced already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |