b. 613-614
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In accordance with the analysis of the Chopinesque or in this and all analogous pairs of bars (see b. 6-7), in the main text we give an averaged, more or less one-bar hairpin. According to us, all markings, regardless of their actual length, are to be interpreted as long accents. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 614
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of EE must be erroneous – such 'generalisation' of schemes of figurations, particularly those containing recurrent elements, is a relatively frequent mistake of engravers – cf. e.g. bar 594. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 615
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE1→EE2), there is no accidental before the penultimate semiquaver. The undoubtedly necessary was added only just in GE3 and EE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 615
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing hairpin in GE is most probably an oversight, although it may have been added in the last phase of proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 615
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |