b. 428
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A comparison with analogous bars 176, 184 and 420 suggests an oversight of 2 or 4 staccato dots in [A] or FE. In the main text, we add dots only under the last quaver in both hands, after bars 176 and 184, in which, like here, the slurs reach the quaver in the middle of the bar. The additions in GE refer to bar 420, while GE3 also changed the slurs accordingly. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 428-432
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the pedalling entered by Chopin into FC (→GE) and added by him in the proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||
b. 429
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 429-432
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Ignored dashes marking the range of cresc. is a frequent inaccuracy of the first Chopinesque editions. The fact that GE2 added dashes only in bar 429 may be explained by an inaccuracy (it is the last bar on the page in GE2 – cf. bars 469-474). However, further dashes may have been thought to be contrary to the hairpins. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 429
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
It is unclear whether Chopin had a long accent in mind, emphasising the last chord of the cadence, or a short , related to the passage opening the four-bar, wavy sequence. In the main text we favour the first interpretation. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents |