|
b. 416-423
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE3, slurs in the L.H. were added in this fragment, most probably under the influence of analogous bars 440-444. It could be considered justified, if not for the fact that the range of the slurs was adjusted to the slurs in the R.H. not in an authentic version, but in an arbitrarily changed one – cf. a corresponding note to bars 417-424. Moreover, Chopin probably consciously rejected slurs in the L.H. in the discussed bars. It is proved by the traces of removal of the slur in the L.H. in bar 418 visible in FE; it was probably in [A] that the slurs in this section were so fragmentary that the composer preferred removing the inaccurate and misleading slurs rather than correcting them, given that the correct phrasing is indicated by the slurs in the R.H. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||
|
b. 416-419
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The dashes marking the range of crescendo were omitted in GE, as in many other places in the Rondo. In EE, the indication – within the marked range – was divided into syllables what is a revision, typical of the English publisher. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
|
b. 416
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 417-431
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In bars 417, 420-421, 423-429 and 431 augmentation dots for the RH minims were supplemented in GE. The dots were omitted in GC in the right bars of the 75-89 sequence. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 417
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
before g1 in the main text.