|
b. 255
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
FE (→GE,EE) has a c category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FES |
|||||
|
b. 255
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of the slur in A is probably Chopin's oversight. The bar is the first one on a new page, and the notation reveals distraction, probably following from haste – there is also no staccato dot under G category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||
|
b. 255
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
No articulation markings in this bar points to possible Chopin's oversight in A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 255
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we include the characteristic Chopinesque indication, requiring the grace note to be performed simultaneously with the corresponding note in the L.H.
See the Nocturne in D category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
|
b. 255
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slashed grace note in GE is most probably a revision or maybe an inaccuracy. In the main text, we preserve the notation of FE (→EE), which is probably authentic. There is a similar situation in bar 257. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
2 as the 2nd semiquaver. It is a typical Terzverschreibung error of the engraver (or perhaps of Chopin in the Stichvorlage for 
in this bar and treble clef in the next one. Due to this reason, in the main text we give this slur, although the authenticity of the addition introduced in 
