



b. 256
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 256
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the entire passage Chopin did not insert any accidentals except the naturals to the 1st and 3rd notes (e and a). The necessity to raise subsequent a
As far as the missing naturals to a1 and a2 are concerned, in GE1 (→FE1,GE2→FESB) it was only the one to a2 that was added, which was supplemented by EE and GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 256
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the manuscripts there are no accidentals in the second triplet (on the 3rd beat of the bar). In the main text we include both added flats – perhaps by Chopin in GE (→FE,EE) – although it is only the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of GE , Last key signature sign |
||||||
b. 256
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we reproduce the clearly written slurs of A, although it is uncertain whether by differentiating the range of these slurs Chopin really wanted to suggest a detail of articulation. Both remaining, unified versions of slurring can be regarded as equivalent variants. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
b. 256-257
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As in analogous bars 172-173 and 176-177, in the main text we suggest adding arpeggio marks to the tenths on the basis of the arpeggios added by Chopin while proofreading FE1 in bars 85-86 and 89-90. category imprint: Editorial revisions |