|
b. 309
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the staccato dot over the 5th quaver in the bar may be Chopin's mistake. Therefore, we suggest an alternative version without staccato. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 309
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Dragging the slur to the minim in this bar is a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. The slur in the L.H. in GE2 is an arbitrary addition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 309-310
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Starting the slur from the beginning of the bar is a typical inaccuracy of GE1 (→FE→EE), corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 309-310
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we adopt the change introduced in GE. While proofreading FE in similar places (bars 291-294 and 307-308), Chopin replaced shorter slurs with one two-bar slur three times; therefore, it is highly likely that leaving this place without correction was either an oversight (of Chopin or the engraver) or an acceptance of a version that was not ideal, but a version that did not significantly distort the phrasing. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 309
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), there is a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign |
before d
2 in the last chord. The mark, superfluous in this context, was removed in