



b. 220
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 220-222
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
As in analogous bar 60 and 62, in the main text we specify the pitch of the top note of the ornament in bar 220 and 222, that is d category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||||||||
b. 220-221
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
According to us, when interpreted literally, the A notation is an example of an uncontrolled change to the concept of articulation markings (another example – see I mov., bar 102). Chopin probably wanted to replace one or both staccato dots with a slur or the other way round. We consider the latter to be more likely – initially, the composer wanted to diversify the bass articulation by writing slurs in bars 219-220 and 220-221; then he decided to use a slur only the second time, to emphasise the modulating B category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges , Partial corrections |
||||||||||||||
b. 221
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||||||
b. 221
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The fingering was most probably added by Chopin in the base text to EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of EE |